Category Archives: Uncategorized

Putin Proposes Direct Talks With Ukraine, Zelensky Says Ceasefire Must Happen First

By Dave DeCamp, Antiwar.com, 5/11/25

On Sunday, Russian President Vladimir Putin proposed starting direct peace talks with Ukraine without preconditions in Turkey this Thursday.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky initially responded by saying there must be a ceasefire before talks could be held. He later said that he was willing to meet with Putin in Istanbul this Thursday, but made clear it would still be conditional on a ceasefire.

“We await a full and lasting ceasefire, starting from tomorrow, to provide the necessary basis for diplomacy. There is no point in prolonging the killings,” Zelesnky wrote on X. “And I will be waiting for Putin in Türkiye on Thursday. Personally. I hope that this time the Russians will not look for excuses.”

In his announcement proposing the talks, Putin said that Ukraine had rejected previous Russian ceasefire offers, including the three-day truce he declared for Russian Victory Day, which ended at midnight on May 11. Throughout the three days, both sides accused the other of violating the ceasefire.

“I will repeat: we have proposed steps towards a ceasefire on many occasions. We have never refused to engage in dialogue with the Ukrainian side,” Putin said.

President Trump said that he wanted Ukraine to accept Putin’s offer for direct talks without a ceasefire. “President Putin of Russia doesn’t want to have a Cease Fire Agreement with Ukraine, but rather wants to meet on Thursday, in Turkey, to negotiate a possible end to the BLOODBATH. Ukraine should agree to this, IMMEDIATELY,” he wrote on Truth Social.

“At least they will be able to determine whether or not a deal is possible, and if it is not, European leaders, and the U.S., will know where everything stands, and can proceed accordingly!” he added.

Despite Trump’s post, Zelensky said he expects a ceasefire to begin on Monday. “Starting tomorrow, we await a ceasefire — this proposal is on the table. A full and unconditional ceasefire, one that lasts long enough to provide a necessary foundation for diplomacy, could significantly bring peace closer,” he said.

European leaders have been threatening to increase sanctions on Russia and ramp up military aid to Ukraine if Moscow doesn’t agree to a 30-day ceasefire, and reportedly have the Trump administration’s support to do so.

***

Putin’s Full Remarks at Announcement of Proposal for Direct Talks with Ukraine Without Preconditions

Kremlin website, 5/11/25

Bolding for emphasis is mine. – Natylie

In conclusion to festive events dedicated to the 80th anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War, Vladimir Putin made a statement for the media where he summarised the results of work on May 7–10.

President of Russia Vladimir Putin: Good evening, or maybe good night already. I want to greet everyone. Ladies and gentlemen. Colleagues.

Allow me to once again congratulate all of you on the Great Victory Day! Thank our friends and foreign partners who have been with us in Moscow these days at the anniversary celebrations to bow to the generation of winners.

We honour all those who contributed to the common victory over Nazism, including our allies in the anti-Hitler coalition, Chinese soldiers, participants in the anti-Fascist resistance in Europe, fighters of the people’s liberation movements in Africa, the Asia-Pacific region, and volunteers from Latin American countries.

Together with our friends and like-minded people, we share a common memory and respect for history, heroic deed of true heroes who fought for freedom, and of course, our responsibility for the future, for building a more just and safer world. The issues that directly affect the stable, sustainable development of the entire world community – Eurasia and other world regions – were at the center of the bilateral and the multilateral meetings held in Moscow.

Of course, they were held in a special, solemn, festive atmosphere, but at the same time they were extremely rich and informative, filled with topics of the political, economic and humanitarian agenda.

Summing up, and this is exactly what I would like to do now, I would say that in four days, from May 7 to May 10, we hosted official visits by the leaders of three foreign states: the People’s Republic of China, the Venezuelan Bolivarian Republic and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.

Additionally, 20 bilateral meetings were held with the heads of the CIS countries, Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Europe and Latin America. In total, 27 heads of state from the CIS, Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Europe, Latin America, as well as about 10 heads of international organizations took part in the celebrations. Another six countries were represented at a high level.

We see inspiring evidence of genuine consolidation around the enduring ideas and values of our common Great Victory in such a wide participation of delegations from foreign countries and international organisations.

We are grateful to the leaders of the 13 states who sent units of the national armed forces to participate in the parade on Red Square. Their shoulder-to-shoulder march with our ceremonial units filled the common holiday with special energy and the spirit of military brotherhood, tempered during the Second World War.

I was pleased to personally thank the military leaders of the Korean People’s Army and convey my warmest words to soldiers and commanders of special forces units of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, who, jointly with our servicemen, professionally, and I want to emphasise this, faithfully performed their assignments during the liberation of the Kursk Region border areas from the Kiev regime forces. I would like to emphasise: they showed courage and heroism, acted – I want to say this again – professionally, to the highest degree, showed good training and preparation.

And of course, it was a special honour for all state leaders to salute the main heroes of the Victory anniversary on the stands – WWII veterans from Russia, Israel, Armenia and Mongolia.

I would like to highlight that, despite threats, blackmail and obstacles caused, including the closure of airspace, the leaders of several European countries – Serbia, Slovakia, Bosnia and Herzegovina – came to Moscow. I would like to reiterate: we understand the massive pressure they faced, and therefore we sincerely appreciate their political courage, firm moral position, decision to share the holiday with us, to pay tribute to the memory of the heroes of the Great Patriotic War, World War II, who fought for their Fatherland and for deliverance from the brown plague of the whole world, of the entire mankind without any exaggeration.

It is important for us that millions of Europeans, state leaders that pursue sovereign policies, remember this. This gives us optimism and hope that sooner or later, based on the lessons of history and the opinion of our peoples, we will begin to move towards restoring constructive relations with European states. Including those who today still do not give up the anti-Russian rhetoric and clearly aggressive actions against us. They are still trying – we can see it right these days – to talk to us, in fact, in a boorish manner and through ultimatums.

Our comprehensive partnership and strategic interaction with the People’s Republic of China can serve as a genuine example of modern equal relations in the 21st century. Chinese President Xi Jinping was the chief guest at the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the Great Victory.

We have had exceptionally fruitful negotiations, we have adopted two joint statements at the level of heads of state, and we have signed a number of intergovernmental and interdepartmental agreements covering such areas as energy, trade, finance, science, culture and much more. As I have already said, it has been agreed that in September I will pay an official return visit to China for the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of victory over militaristic Japan.

It is deeply symbolic and natural that the principal, in fact the main commemorative events related to the 80th anniversary of the end of WWII in Europe and Asia will be held in Moscow and Beijing – in the capital cities of the states whose peoples passed through the hardest trials and paid the highest price for the common Victory.

Colleagues, I think it is obvious to everyone that the talks and meetings held in Moscow also touched on the issue of resolving the conflict in Ukraine. We are grateful to all our guests, our friends, for the attention they are paying to this conflict and for the efforts they are making to bring this conflict to an end. In this connection, I believe it is necessary to dwell on this topic separately.

So, I want to say that, as it is known, Russia has proposed ceasefire initiatives on several occasions, but they, these initiatives, have been repeatedly sabotaged by Ukraine. For example, the Kiev regime defiantly violated about 130 times the 30-day – I want to make it a point – 30-day moratorium, from March 18 to April 17, on strikes against energy facilities, which was declared in accordance with our agreement with US President Donald Trump.

The Easter truce initiated by Russia was not observed either: the ceasefire regime was violated by Ukrainian forces almost 5,000 times. Nevertheless, for the celebration of Victory Day – and we consider this to be a sacred holiday for us as well, just imagine that we lost 27 million people – we declared a ceasefire for the third time on this holiday, which is sacred to us.

Incidentally we conveyed to those of our colleagues in the West who, in my opinion, are sincerely looking for ways to settlement, our position on this issue, on a ceasefire on Victory Day, and that in the future we do not exclude the possibility of extending the terms of this truce – but, of course, after analysing what will happen in these several days, based on the results of how the Kiev regime will react to our proposal.

And what do we see? What are these results? The Kiev authorities, as you can see for yourself, did not respond at all to our ceasefire proposal. Moreover, after the announcement of our proposal – and this happened, as you remember, on May 5 – the Kiev authorities launched large-scale attacks in the early hours of May 7. As many as 524 unmanned aerial vehicles and a number of Western–made missiles participated in the strike, and 45 unmanned boats were used simultaneously in the Black Sea.

Actually, during these three days of the ceasefire that we announced – on May 8, 9 and 10 – happened what you also saw from the media, in fact, from your reports, it was clear: during this time, five targeted attempts were made to attack the state border of the Russian Federation in the area of the Kursk Region and at the junction with the Belgorod Region, precisely during the days of the ceasefire we announced. Additionally, another 36 attacks were made in other areas. All these attacks, including attempts to enter the territory of the Russian Federation in the Kursk Region and the Belgorod Region, were repulsed. Moreover, our military experts believe that they had no military significance, were conducted solely for political reasons and the enemy suffered very heavy losses.

As I have already said, the Kiev authorities not only declined our ceasefire proposal, but also, as we all saw, tried to intimidate the leaders of the states who gathered for the celebrations in Moscow. You know, when I met with colleagues here in Moscow, a thought occurred to me. I’ll share it with you: who were they trying to intimidate among those who came to Moscow to celebrate the Victory over Nazi Germany? Who were they trying to frighten? Those who have come to us are leaders not by position or a post, they are leaders by character, by their beliefs and willingness to stand for their beliefs. And who was trying to intimidate them? Those who stand at attention and salute, applaud former SS soldiers? And elevates those who collaborated with Hitler during WWII to the rank of national heroes? It seems to me that this is an attempt with obviously unsuitable means and those who are trying to do this do not correspond to the scale they expect themselves.

I will repeat: we have proposed steps towards a ceasefire on many occasions. We have never refused to engage in dialogue with the Ukrainian side. Let me remind you again: it was not us who interrupted the negotiations in 2022; it was the Ukrainian side. In this connection, despite everything, we propose that the authorities in Kiev should resume the negotiations that they interrupted at the end of 2022 and resume direct talks. And, I stress, without any preconditions.

We suggest starting without delay next Thursday, May 15, in Istanbul, where they were held earlier and where they were interrupted. As you know, Turkish colleagues have repeatedly offered their services to organise such talks, and President Erdogan has done a lot to organise them. I recall that as a result of these talks a joint draft document was prepared and initialed by the head of the Kiev negotiating group, but at the insistence of the West it was simply thrown into the basket.

Tomorrow we are going to have a conversation with the President of Turkiye, Mr Erdogan. I would like to ask him to provide such an opportunity to hold talks in Turkiye. I hope that he will confirm his desire to contribute to the search for peace in Ukraine.

We are set on serious negotiations with Ukraine. Their aim is to eliminate the root causes of the conflict and to achieve a long-term lasting peace for a historical perspective. We do not rule out that in the course of these negotiations it will become possible to agree on some kind of new truce and a new ceasefire. And a real ceasefire that would be observed not only by Russia but also by the Ukrainian side and would be the first step, I repeat, towards a long-term, sustainable peace, rather than a prelude to continuing armed conflict after the Ukrainian armed forces have been rearmed, re-equipped and frantically digged trenches and new strongholds. Who needs such peace?

Our proposal is, as they say, on the table. The decision is now up to Ukrainian authorities and their supervisors, who are seemingly guided by their personal political ambitions, rather than the interests of their peoples, want to continue the war against Russia at the hands of Ukrainian nationalists.

Let me reiterate myself: Russia is ready for talks without any preliminary conditions. There are combat actions and war going on now, and we propose to resume negotiations that were not interrupted by us. Well, what’s wrong about it?

Those who really want peace cannot but support this. At the same time, I would like to express my gratitude once again for the mediation services and efforts aimed at a peaceful settlement of the Ukrainian crisis undertaken by our foreign partners, including China, Brazil, African countries, the Middle East, and recently the new Administration of the United States of America.

In conclusion, I would like to once again thank everyone who shared with us the festive celebrations dedicated to the 80th anniversary of the Victory over Nazism. I am sure that the spirit of solidarity and harmony that united us in Moscow these days will continue to help us build fruitful cooperation and partnership in the name of progress, security and peace.

I would also like to take this opportunity to note the tremendous role of journalists, representatives of international information agencies, TV channels, and the press who covered the anniversary events and the many-hour programme of current negotiations and working meetings. Much has been done to ensure that people in different countries of the world experience the unique atmosphere of the current holidays in Moscow. Of course, I thank you for this meeting as well, as it is held quite late and, of course, everyone is already tired.

Thank you very much for your attention, as it’s almost half past one in the morning, or even later than half past one in Moscow, God be with you.

Thank you very much for your attention. Goodbye.

Russia Matters: US, Europe Finalizing 30-Day Ukraine Ceasefire Proposal; Putin Describes Russia-China Relations as ‘Unbreakable Friendship’

Russia Matters, 5/9/25

  1. The U.S. and Europe are finalizing a proposal for a 30-day ceasefire in Ukraine. If Russia refuses the proposal, it will trigger new jointly imposed sanctions on Russia, according to Reuters. “What could happen in the coming hours and days, there could be an announcement of a ceasefire either of 30 days or compartmentalized, which is still being discussed,” a French diplomatic source said May 9. A meeting of Ukraine’s closest allies is due to take place on May 10, where the U.S.-European proposal will be discussed. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Finnish President Alexander Stubb have both expressed optimism that a ceasefire agreement could be reached as soon as “this weekend,” according to RBC.ua. Russia supports the implementation of a 30-day ceasefire in the Ukraine conflict, but only with due consideration of “nuances” in the more than three-year-old war, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov was quoted as saying on May 9, Reuters reports.
  2. Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping met in the Kremlin on May 8 for bilateral meetings, after which Putin said that Russia-China cooperation had reached its “highest level,” describing the relationship as an “unbreakable friendship,” according to the Washington Post. In a joint statement on “global strategic stability” published on the Kremlin website, they warned that “a critical mass of problems and challenges has accumulated in the strategic sphere, and the risk of nuclear conflict has increased.” Nuclear powers should maintain “constructive” relations to ensure international security, according to the document, which made no mention of Russia’s war in Ukraine, according to Bloomberg; however, the Chinese Foreign Ministry reported that Putin said Russia is ready to begin peace talks on Ukraine without preconditions and hopes for a just and lasting peace agreement. The joint statement also pledged to strengthen military cooperation and criticized Donald Trump’s proposal to develop an Iron Dome-like missile defense system, MT/AFP reports. “Both countries are conducting an independent and autonomous foreign policy, and are interested in forming a more just and democratic, multipolar world order,” Putin said after the talks concluded, Bloomberg reports. The Kremlin also announced that Putin will travel to China at the end of August and beginning of September.
  3. Military aid to Ukraine from the U.S. and EU is reportedly set to increase in the coming months. On May 4, The New York Times reported that a Patriot air-defense system previously based in Israel will be sent to Ukraine after it is refurbished, and Western allies are also discussing the logistics of Germany or Greece giving another one. Meanwhile, according to Bloomberg, the U.S. State Department approved F-16 fighter-jet training and services for Ukraine worth up to $350 million, “signaling that the White House will keep supporting Kyiv in the fight against Russia,” Bloomberg reports. Additionally, on May 9, the EU pledged to allocate 1 billion euros ($1.1 billion) from the proceeds of frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine’s defense industry, MT/AFP reports.
  4. Despite the reverence for Ukraine’s war dead, they, too, have become an income stream for corrupt officials, the Wall Street Journal reports. Some funeral homes pay officials to win large contracts for transporting or burying dead troops, according to officials with knowledge of the transactions. Funeral homes overcharge councils for soldiers’ headstones and coffins and split the difference with officials, police say.
  5. Two South American states this week sought closer ties with Russia, as Putin and his Venezuelan counterpart Nicolás Maduro signed a strategic partnership treaty and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva offered Putin wide-ranging cooperation on a variety of areas, MT/AFP reports. The strategic partnership with Venezuela is the latest in a series of alliances Russia has forged since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, according to MT/AFP, while Brazil’s Lula told Putin: “My visit today is aimed at strengthening the building of our strategic partnership,” according to a Russian-language readout. The closer ties between Venezuela, Brazil and Russia threaten a longstanding acknowledgment of South America as a U.S. sphere of interest.1 Since taking office in January 2025, Trump has appeared to endorse a U.S. foreign policy that reanimates spheres of influence as a legitimate interest of great powers, of which he also counts Russia and China. Russia’s strengthened connections to these South American states may increase the friction between a Trump administration newly interested in acquiring, for example, Greenland, and a Russia potentially bent on re-establishing Ukraine and central Europe as its own sphere of influence.*
  6. Putin on May 9 celebrated the 80th anniversary of the Soviet Union’s victory over Nazi Germany “with a Red Square military parade designed to place Moscow at the vanguard of a rising, non-Western world order,” the New York Times reports. Putin was joined by more than 20 foreign leaders from countries that largely position themselves as neutral or hostile to the West, including the leaders of China and Brazil and North Korean generals. Servicemen from “friendly nations” also took part in the event, though no North Korean soldiers marched in the parade, according to MT/AFP. No senior American officials were known to be in attendance. 

***

Read the transcript of Putin’s Victory Day speech here.

You can watch the Victory Day celebration below. YouTube link here. Unfortunately I have not yet been able to find a video that includes any English translation of Putin’s speech.

Putin’s ONLY Option To End The War Is TOTAL TAKEOVER Of Ukraine: Kim Iversen Interviews Scott Horton

YouTube link here.

Ben Aris: Kremlin sets the conditions for foreign companies to return to Russian market

By Ben Aris, Intellinews, 4/10/25

Thanks to the tangible thaw in US-Russian relations, Russian President Vladimir Putin has ordered the government to work out the conditions for firms to return. The list is ready, The Bell reported on April 10.

A special government commission will assess all applications for market re-entry, with approval contingent on fulfilment of a range of industrial and political criteria. Without this authorisation, companies will not be permitted to resume operations in Russia. No one has applied to return so far, but a few firms have expressed an interest.

Putin opened the door for the return of Western companies towards the end of February, but made it clear that they could only return on the Kremlin’s terms and in a way that was beneficial to the Russian economy.

On the downside, any firm that took sides against Russia in the Ukraine conflict would be barred from operating.

On the upside, the Kremlin is going to force companies to localise production of inputs – something that the Kremlin was trying to get companies to do for years, especially in the automotive sector – without much luck. The goal is to accelerate the modernisation of Russia and promote import substitution, something the Kremlin has not made much progress with.

Specifically, the conditions, reported by Russian business daily RBC, include:

-Obtain approval from a special government commission (without which re-entry is not possible);

-Guarantee localisation of production within Russia;

-Commit to technology transfer and creation of research centres;

-Establish performance indicators for investment in development (KPIs);

-Comply with requirements for the level of robotisation in production;

-Form joint ventures with:

-Existing Russian shareholders of the former business, or

-Systemically important Russian enterprises;

-Prioritise inclusion of products in the Ministry of Industry and Trade’s list of 329 items for import substitution;

-Allow Russian businesses to pre-assess risks and vote on the advisability of a foreign firm’s return;

-Demonstrate previous compliance when exiting the Russian market:

-Fulfilled financial obligations (e.g. paid salaries, no outstanding debts)

-Did not support foreign agents, the Armed Forces of Ukraine or other hostile entities.

Many companies left Russia, selling their businesses to their local management in widespread MBOs, and many of these deals included a buy-back option should relations improve. However, the Kremlin has indicated these options will not be respected.

In the case of the Renault carmaker that was in a joint venture with Russian automotive titan AvtoVaz, the French firm sold its stake for a reported RUB2, but with an option to buy it back for the same price. However, a few days after Putin’s comments, AvtoVAZ president Maxim Sokolov said that Renault would have to pay $1.3bn if it wants its shares back, the amount of “extra” investment the Russian car company had to invest as a result of Renault’s departure.

In other sectors, especially retail, requests by foreign companies to retake control of their franchises will simply be ignored. McDonald’s, for example, spent three decades building up its chain, which was taken over by Vkusna i Tochka (Tasty. Period), including its flagship outlet on Pushkin’s Square in central Moscow. Since then the new owner has continued to invest, rolling out new stores in Russia’s regions and reported that the chain had become more profitable than the original after the first year of operations.

Most of the new owners have little incentive to sell them back to their original owners. During the exodus Russia saw one of the biggest transfers of wealth and property in its history, where entrepreneurs and managers picked up mature and profitable businesses with hundreds of thousands of dollars of turnover at very deep discounts. Franchises such as McDonald’s, if it returns at all, will be forced to start from scratch.

Encouraging foreign direct investment (FDI) is a classic goal of any government, as it brings not only the transfer of technology, but also management skills. But the Kremlin has been frustrated by the reluctance of international companies to set up full production lines in Russia. In the automotive sector just under two thirds of car parts continue to be imported from the European Original Equipment Manufacturers’ (OEMs) Western European parts plants as a way to prevent the authorities usurping their industry. In other businesses, like the French DIY retailer Leroy Merlin, the international companies have been more proactive, making investments in light manufacturing production after Chinese wages, a major source of product cost, overtook Russian labour wages. One of the most active foreign investors was Swedish furniture retailer IKEA – it refused to leave Russia after the invasion of Ukraine – which set up a credit scheme to finance the construction of Russia-based factories to make their products. However, the bulk of Russian FDI is the reinvestment of profits earned by multinationals operating in the market – a quirk of Russian national accounting is this reinvestment is counted as FDI, which is not the case in most markets – and not true FDI, which remains small by most emerging markets’ standards.

Now the Kremlin intends to force international firms that want to return to make these commitments by fiat rather than market forces.

In addition to the localisation of production, a key requirement includes the establishment of research centres, and the setting of specific investment performance indicators. Authorities will specifically evaluate technological contributions, such as the level of automation: Russia currently operates just 19 robots per 10,000 employees, compared with the global average of 162 and will set KPIs relating to the number of robots used in a new factory.

Foreign firms must also form joint ventures with Russian partners – either existing shareholders from their previous Russian operations or state-designated “systemically important” companies, but this will be done in terms of delivering as yet undefined “benefits” for the domestic economy.

The Ministry of Industry and Trade will prioritise applications from companies making products on the list of 329 items crucial for import substitution, but their domestic partners will also have a say in the process.

Applicants will also have to demonstrate their neutrality on sanctions and the Ukraine conflict. Moreover, they will need to prove they settled outstanding wages and cleared debts during their exit.

Ian Proud: Will anyone criticize Zelensky’s threat to attack the Moscow Victory Day parade?

By Ian Proud, Substack, 5/3/25

Ian Proud was a member of His Britannic Majesty’s Diplomatic Service from 1999 to 2023. He served as the Economic Counsellor at the British Embassy in Moscow from July 2014 to February 2019. Prior to Moscow, he organized the 2013 G8 Summit in Lough Erne, Northern Ireland, working out of 10 Downing Street. He recently published his memoir, “A Misfit in Moscow: How British diplomacy in Russia failed, 2014-2019.”

President Zelensky has threatened to attack the Victory Day military parade in Moscow on May 9. This is disgraceful. And it is shocking that western politicians have not said so.

Amidst an ongoing war in Ukraine, countries involved in the defeat of Nazi Germany are preparing to mark the end of World War II, or the Great Patriotic War, as it is known in Russia. His Majesty the King will lead commemorations in Britain on 8 May. Russia and other former Soviet Countries such as Kazakhstan mark the end of the war on 9 May. The history is complex but boils down to a disagreement on the formal timing of Germany’s signature of the Instrument of Surrender.

As this is the 80th anniversary of the end of the war, the celebrations will be bigger than normal. A host of foreign dignitaries will be in Britain and in Russia, including the President Xi Jinping of China who’ll travel to Moscow.

Given the ongoing tussle over agreeing an end to the war in Ukraine, President Putin has announced a seventy two hour ceasefire covering the Victory Day period. That is to be welcomed.

Ukraine has been pressing for a more immediate 30 day unconditional ceasefire. However, as no concrete agreement has been reached on key sticking points, and with two separate and very different U.S. and European peace proposals in circulation, Russia has yet to agree to this.

I continue to hope for an end to this senseless war which has claimed over one million irrecoverable casualties already.

However, rather than taking up direct negotiations with Russia, something that the U.S. side has recommended and the Russian government has appeared receptive to, Zelensky has chosen instead to threaten an attack on Moscow on Victory Day. He said specifically:

“We are choosing precisely those sore points in Russia that will most prompt Moscow to diplomacy. Now they are worried that their parade is in question, and they are right to be worried.”

This is beyond contemptible. Zelensky claims that this threat is about pressuring Russia to agree to a diplomatic solution, but that is absurd. As Zelensky will well know, an attack on Moscow on Victory Day would lead to a sharp escalation of the war from the Russian side. It would destroy any hope of diplomacy.

For Russia and for other countries of the former Soviet Union, the 9 May commemoration is hugely symbolic and sacred, just as the 8 May commemoration is in Britain. The Soviet Union is thought to have suffered up to twenty seven million deaths during the war.

That’s an order of magnitude far in excess of casualties suffered by Britain, at around half a million people. I don’t say that to diminish British losses.

We honour the sacrifice of every civilian and member of service personnel who died during the war on May 8. My great uncle William Marrs was captured by the Japanese in Hong Kong and later died when a ship transporting him and 1800 other prisoners to hard labour camps in Japan was sunk off the coat of Korea on 1 October 1942. I remember his service to my country with pride tinged with sadness.

Russian people remember their losses with the same depths of emotion. When I lived in Moscow, I witnessed the Victory Day events each May and the pride and celebration among ordinary Russian people was identical to that I see among British people.

I also recall the Immortal Regiment, in which tens of thousands of citizens parade through Moscow holding photographs of their relatives who died during the war. When Nicholas Soames, grandson of Winston Churchill, visited Moscow ten years ago for the seventieth anniversary of the end of the war, the British Embassy posted an image on social media of him holding a photograph of his grandfather, our iconic wartime Prime Minister. Ahead of travelling to Moscow, Soames said, ‘We share in this Victory Day, as Britain and Russia stood together with our allies against the Nazis.’

Indeed, in 2010, British troops marched through Red Square to mark the 65th anniversary of the end of the war, though the thought seems impossible today.

Victory Day is a time for remembrance.

Zelensky has done a great discredit to his position as President of Ukraine and to the people of Ukraine. Around half of the Soviet losses took place in Ukraine at the hands of Nazi Germany.

But what concerns me as greatly is that western leaders have not distanced themselves from Zelensky’s comments. I have seen no words of rebuke from leaders in London, Berlin, Paris or Washington DC. Why have they not condemned Zelensky’s threat to attack a peaceful parade to mark the end of the twentieth century’s most devastating war? Indeed, since Zelensky’s outburst, Britain has announced, instead, that Ukrainian troops will take part in military commemorative parades in this country.

Had President Putin threatened to launch attacks on London on May 8, the British Army would be mobilising, and we’d be gearing up for World War III. Instead, Zelensky’s outburst is greeted with indifference.

How have we become so morally reduced that we have imbued Zelensky with such impunity that he can wage a war at our expense and take every step imaginable to prolong the war, with increasingly desperate and disgusting press stunts?

I hope that Zelensky is bluffing with his latest inflammatory threat. But what would we do if Ukraine did launch attacks on Moscow, on Victory Day? Would we condemn it?

I hope in that situation we would withdraw all support from Ukraine, pressure Zelensky to step down, ushering in long-overdue elections, while talking to Russia to prevent a quick escalation to World War III. I worry, however, that we would suck our teeth, deflect, and find some way to blame Russia.