Reuters: Exclusive: Russia could concede $300 billion in frozen assets as part of Ukraine war settlement, sources say

Reuters, 2/21/25

Summary

-Russia may concede frozen assets for Ukraine reconstruction, sources say

-Russia will demand some of the funds for territories it controls, sources says

-US and Russian officials met in Riyadh, not clear if frozen funds discussed

MOSCOW, Feb 21 (Reuters) – Russia could agree to using $300 billion of sovereign assets frozen in Europe for reconstruction in Ukraine but will insist that part of the money is spent on the one-fifth of the country that Moscow’s forces control, three sources told Reuters.

Russia and the United States held their first face-to-face talks on ending the Ukraine war on Feb. 18 in Saudi Arabia and both U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin have said they hope to meet soon.

After Putin sent troops into Ukraine in 2022, the United States and its allies prohibited transactions with Russia’s central bank and finance ministry, blocking $300-$350 billion of sovereign Russian assets, mostly European, U.S. and British government bonds held in a European securities depository.

While discussions between Russia and the United States are at a very early stage, one idea being floated in Moscow is that Russia could propose using a large chunk of the frozen reserves for rebuilding Ukraine as part of a possible peace deal, according to three sources with knowledge of the matter.

Swathes of eastern Ukraine have been devastated by the war and hundreds of thousands of soldiers killed or injured on both sides while millions of Ukrainians have fled to European countries or Russia. A year ago, the World Bank estimated reconstruction and recovery would cost $486 billion.

The sources spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the discussions and because discussions are only preliminary. The Kremlin declined to comment.

The idea that Russia may agree to using the frozen money to help rebuild Ukraine has not been previously reported, and may give an insight into what Russia is willing to compromise on as Moscow and Washington seek to end the war, at a time when Trump is pushing for U.S. access to Ukrainian minerals to repay Washington’s support.

Russia’s main demands to stop the fighting include a withdrawal of Kyiv’s troops from Ukrainian territory Moscow claims and an end to Ukraine’s ambitions to join NATO. Ukraine says Russia must withdraw from its territory, and wants security guarantees from the West. The Trump administration says Ukraine has unrealistic, “illusionary” goals.

Reuters could not establish whether the idea of using the frozen funds was discussed between Russia and U.S. counterparts in the Saudi meeting.

The Group of Seven stated in 2023 that the Russian sovereign funds will remain frozen until Russia pays for the damage it inflicted in Ukraine. Trump has said he would like Russia to return to the G7, a grouping of wealthy nations.

Russian Central Bank Governor Elvira Nabiullina said on Thursday the bank was not part of any talks on lifting sanctions or unfreezing of Russia’s reserves.

Russia has previously said plans to use the funds in Ukraine amounted to robbery.

The Ukrainian foreign ministry and the White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The British Foreign Office declined to comment.

“Nothing about Ukraine and the EU can be decided without Ukraine and the EU,” said Anitta Hipper, a spokesperson for the European Commission. She said the EU and member states were helping Ukraine strengthen its position ahead of any talks, including with a new round of sanctions on Russia.

Renaissance Capital lead analyst Oleg Kouzmin said the differences between the United States and Europe, which controls most of the assets, would complicate a lifting of the freeze.

“It would require the European side to fully back the current stance of the U.S. aimed at dialog with Russia,” Kouzmin said, calling such a scenario “very optimistic”.

TWO THIRD SPLIT?

Russia’s frozen sovereign assets have been the subject of intense debate in the West with some proposing it be essentially given to Ukraine through a complex “repatriation loan”, opens new tab.

One source with knowledge of the discussions in Moscow said that Russia could accept up to two-thirds of the reserves going to the restoration of Ukraine under a peace deal, provided there were accountability guarantees.

The rest could go to the Russian-controlled territories in eastern Ukraine that Russia now considers to be part of Russia, said the source.

Another source with knowledge of discussions said that Moscow would agree to using the money to rebuild Ukraine but that it was too early to say what the possible division might be. Two sources stressed that it was important to discuss which companies would get future contracts for reconstruction.

A different source, close to the Kremlin but not directly involved in the discussions, said that Russia would still demand the lifting of the freeze on the assets as part of gradual sanctions relief.

Several Western officials, especially in the German government and European Central Bank, have been reluctant to simply confiscate sovereign reserves, warning that such a move could face legal challenges and undermine the euro as a reserve currency.

Russian officials have repeatedly warned that the state confiscation of assets goes against free market principles, destroys banking security and erodes faith in reserve currencies. In retaliation, Russia has drafted legislation to confiscate funds from companies and investors from so-called unfriendly states, those that have hit it with sanctions. The bill has not yet been voted in Russia’s State Duma lower house.

EUROPEAN FREEZE

At the time the assets were frozen, Russia’s central bank said it held around $207 billion in euro assets, $67 billion in U.S. dollar assets and $37 billion in British pound assets.

It also had holdings comprising $36 billion of Japanese yen, $19 billion in Canadian dollars, $6 billion in Australian dollars and $1.8 billion in Singapore dollars. Its Swiss franc holdings were about $1 billion.

Russia reports its total gold and foreign exchange reserves as around $627 billion, including the frozen funds. The value of Russia’s frozen assets fluctuates according to bond prices and currency movements.

The bank’s biggest bond holdings were in the sovereign bonds of China, Germany, France, Britain, Austria and Canada. Russia’s gold reserves were held in Russia.

Around 159 billion euros of the assets were managed by Belgian clearing house Euroclear Bank as of early last year, Euroclear has said.

While the freezing of the funds has angered Moscow, some of Russia’s most outspoken war hawks have previously acknowledged Russia may eventually part with the frozen reserves, provided that the controlled territories stay within Russia.

“I propose a solution. They pay this money towards our purchase of those territories, those lands that want to be with us,” said Margarita Simonyan, head of the Russian state broadcaster RT, in 2023.

The Russian-controlled territories of Ukraine account for about 1% of Russia’s gross domestic product, but some economists believe that their share could grow quickly if they remain with Russia when the war ends.

The regions already provide around 5% of Russia’s grain harvest.

4 thoughts on “Reuters: Exclusive: Russia could concede $300 billion in frozen assets as part of Ukraine war settlement, sources say”

  1. Whenever you see a story with “sources say” you have to question the motivations for the leaks. When it also says: “The sources spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the discussions” — then you have further evidence that the leakers are motivated to disrupt or influence such discussions. Reuters plays the role of loyal mouthpiece for US propaganda dissemination — in this case, most likely by intelligence agencies. With ignorant US negotiators sent to Saudi Arabia (people who don’t understand the reality on the ground in Ukraine and who show up with no outlines of a settlement plan), and with neocon-neoliberal Western leaders still believing the nonsense coming out of MSM and think-tanks about the war — that Ukraine and the EU can still win, and that any peace agreement will open the door to a Russia that is hell bent on world domination — one has to realize this is just more fantasy news directed at Western leaders and the public. Such “news” is designed to suggest Russia is on its back foot and ready to give in. This seems to be well timed propaganda to confuse — and likely designed to shore up any retreat on the war in order to keep the war going. How many times did “sources say” Russia was about to run out of ammo? The Russians understand these mind games which are played to influence Congress, the Administration and/or EU puppets — often for the benefit of intelligence agencies or the military industrial complex. Russians don’t buy any of this bullshit. If the EU actually confiscates Russian assets, the Russians will reciprocate. In such circumstances, the EU will be raising the new iron curtain on trade that will be the death knell to their economies.

  2. Reuters, that’s to say MI5/6, is just spreading Malarky. I’ll believe it when I see it as Kremlin has already protested the freezing of the assets and the seizure of the interest to both be criminal acts, which they would not want to normalize, even under a quid pro quo. This is just making noise for Eurobonds to fund more corruption in Ukraine.

    1. WordPress or the server farm is blocking a link to R I A N o v o s t i. If you’re interested to know more, 26 Feb they have Lavrov’s statement about the funds and interest as theft. Hope this sticks.

  3. Wikispooks has a few interesting observations about Reuters.
    https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Reuters

    History

    The British government secretly funded Reuters in the 1960s and 1970s at the behest of Information Research Department (IRD), the British government’s anti-Soviet propaganda unit linked to British intelligence. The source of the funding was concealed by using the BBC as a conduit to make the payments.

    The secret government financing of Reuters amounted to 245,000 pounds ($317,838 at 2020 exchange rates) per year before 1969 but then reduced to 100,000 pounds per year in 1969-1970.

    “The new relationship established with Reuters in the Middle East and Latin America can lead to valuable goodwill and cooperation with the Agency on a global scale,” John Peck, former head of the IRD, said in declassified government documents.[2]

    People

    James C. Smith is also on the board of Atlantic Council and Pfizer
    Alessandra Galloni, editor-in-chief of Reuters since 2021, was a selected a Young Global Leader by the World Economic Forum in 2007.
    James C. Smith, CEO of the world’s biggest news agency, is on the board of Atlantic Council, the most central military-industrial/NATO think-tank. Thomson Reuters consistently promotes a very strong pro-US/NATO line in geopolitical questions. He is also on the board of Pfizer.[3]
    The Canadian politician Chrystia Freeland, who the The US State Department boasted had adopted an “America first” foreign policy, in 2010 became global editor-at-large of Reuters. Later she went back to Canadian politics.
    Dawn Scalici joined Thomson Reuters in July 2015 to serve as the company’s first Government Global Business Director, where she “develops strategic relationships with government sector constituents and key decision-makers, develops campaigns to promote Thomson Reuters’ business growth, and works with the company’s senior executives to determine relevant strategic goals and plans.”…” Prior to joining Thomson Reuters, Scalici served 33 years with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).[4]
    Natalie Runyon, the Director of Enterprise Content for Talent, Inclusion and Culture “has more than 20 years of experience working and volunteering for multinational organizations, including Thomson Reuters, Goldman Sachs, and the Central Intelligence Agency.” Her current job has a hand in the company’s recruitment and promotion process, nominally to include women and minorities.
    Asli Kandemir, Turkish Service editor for Thomson Reuters, was a spooky Marshall Memorial Fellow 2012.

Comments are closed.